Joint Comments on the Draft Law on Internal Affairs: General remarks and overview of key deficiencies
As the coordinator of the Working Group for Chapter 24 within the National Convention on the European Union (NCEU), BCSP compiled joint comments from nine NCEU member organizations on the Draft Law on Internal Affairs, which was subject to official public debate in April 2026.
The Draft Law on Internal Affairs prepared by the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Serbia does not meet procedural requirements, ignores key problems identified in practice, and, in some instances, even undermines the standards achieved. Moreover, the Draft Law fails to achieve the envisaged objectives for the reform step 9.3.1.2. in Serbia’s Reform Agenda, i.e., to effectively address the issue of police autonomy from the Ministry of Interior during the pre-investigation and investigation phases, as well as the recommendations from the Committee for Prevention of Torture.
In this document, a brief overview of the procedural and material deficiencies in the Draft Law is provided, highlighting several conclusions: the operational independence of the police is only declarative; human rights and the prevention of torture remain below the required standards; internal and external controls are in decline; and human resources management needs improvement.
The NCEU Working Groups for Chapters 23 and 24 assess the manner in which the public debate on the Draft Law on Internal Affairs has been conducted as unacceptable for both the citizens of Serbia and Serbia’s European integration process. While formally aligned with minimum procedural requirements, the process substantially restricts public participation.
This document has been sent to the European Commission, which is expected to evaluate the revised Draft Law after the official public debate.
The joint comments in English are available here. The full version of the joint comments in Serbian is available here. Moreover, BCSP detailed and reasoned comments are available here.
Civil society organisations, journalists, and human rights defenders across the Western Balkans and European Union (EU) are operating in a digital environment defined by raising threats and inadequate protection. This analysis presents findings from a needs assessment survey conducted within the “Defending Digital Freedoms: Strengthening Civil Society Resilience against Digital Repression in Europe” project, gathering 239 responses from 11 countries (six Western Balkan and five EU member states).
This paper examines how the Serbian Orthodox Church (SOC) is portrayed in existing research and media discourse, primarily as a major conduit of Russian influence in the Western Balkans through narratives tied to the Kremlin’s “Russian World” project and hybrid warfare activities.
This publication assesses how six external actors - Russia, China, Türkiye, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Israel, and Azerbaijan - engage with the Western Balkans (WB) and how such engagement affects the European Union (EU) enlargement process.
PUBLICATION: Comment
Joint Comments on the Draft Law on Internal Affairs: General remarks and overview of key deficiencies
As the coordinator of the Working Group for Chapter 24 within the National Convention on the European Union (NCEU), BCSP compiled joint comments from nine NCEU member organizations on the Draft Law on Internal Affairs, which was subject to official public debate in April 2026.
The Draft Law on Internal Affairs prepared by the Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Serbia does not meet procedural requirements, ignores key problems identified in practice, and, in some instances, even undermines the standards achieved. Moreover, the Draft Law fails to achieve the envisaged objectives for the reform step 9.3.1.2. in Serbia’s Reform Agenda, i.e., to effectively address the issue of police autonomy from the Ministry of Interior during the pre-investigation and investigation phases, as well as the recommendations from the Committee for Prevention of Torture.
In this document, a brief overview of the procedural and material deficiencies in the Draft Law is provided, highlighting several conclusions: the operational independence of the police is only declarative; human rights and the prevention of torture remain below the required standards; internal and external controls are in decline; and human resources management needs improvement.
More detail is provided on areas highlighted in the Reform Agenda of 2024, Report of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CPT) from January 2024 and GRECO Fifth round of evaluations of 2022 regarding anti-corruption measures in law enforcement, as well as the other most problematic provisions.
The NCEU Working Groups for Chapters 23 and 24 assess the manner in which the public debate on the Draft Law on Internal Affairs has been conducted as unacceptable for both the citizens of Serbia and Serbia’s European integration process. While formally aligned with minimum procedural requirements, the process substantially restricts public participation.
This document has been sent to the European Commission, which is expected to evaluate the revised Draft Law after the official public debate.
The joint comments in English are available here. The full version of the joint comments in Serbian is available here. Moreover, BCSP detailed and reasoned comments are available here.
Tags: Draft Law on Internal Affairs, joint comments, Ministry of the Interior of the Republic of Serbia, NCEU, Reform Agenda
DETAILS
DATE: 28.05.2026
TOPICS: EU, In Focus, Rule of Law
TYPE: Comment
DOI Number: <a href="" target="blank">
AUTHORS
SHARE
PDF PREVIEW
PROJECT SUMMARY
RELATED
Under Pressure: Digital Security of Civil Society in the Western Balkans and the European Union
Date: 27.05.2026.
Author: Anđela Savić |
Civil society organisations, journalists, and human rights defenders across the Western Balkans and European Union (EU) are operating in a digital environment defined by raising threats and inadequate protection. This analysis presents findings from a needs assessment survey conducted within the “Defending Digital Freedoms: Strengthening Civil Society Resilience against Digital Repression in Europe” project, gathering 239 responses from 11 countries (six Western Balkan and five EU member states).
More Than Moscow’s Shadow: Serbia’s Orthodox Church and Regional Influence
Date: 07.04.2026.
Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy
This paper examines how the Serbian Orthodox Church (SOC) is portrayed in existing research and media discourse, primarily as a major conduit of Russian influence in the Western Balkans through narratives tied to the Kremlin’s “Russian World” project and hybrid warfare activities.
Friends or Foes? External Actors and the EU’s Western Balkans Policy
Date: 24.03.2026.
Author: Dr Srđan Cvijić |
This publication assesses how six external actors - Russia, China, Türkiye, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Israel, and Azerbaijan - engage with the Western Balkans (WB) and how such engagement affects the European Union (EU) enlargement process.