22.09.2016.

SHARE

News:

Serbia needs new Security Service Law

At the moment Serbia has three laws guverning security  services, which are not harmonized , there has been no reform of the Security services and control and supervision are not implemented in practice. Those are the main reasons for the adoption of new, umbrella law – it was underlined in ...

At the moment Serbia has three laws guverning security  services, which are not harmonized , there has been no reform of the Security services and control and supervision are not implemented in practice. Those are the main reasons for the adoption of new, umbrella law – it was underlined in the event of public presentation of Model Law on security services, that was organized by Belgrade Center for Security Policy (BCSP) on 22 September 2016 in the Media center.

„The goal is to strenghten the public debate on the supervision and control of security services, as well as the need for democratic order in Serbia to improve. A minimume of control should be established over the security services and their civilian chiefs should be prevented from abusing their powers and causing damage“ said Chairman of the Board of BCSP Miroslav Hadzic, a coautor of the Model Law, together with Bogoljub Milosavljevic, proffeesor of University Union and member of the Board of BCSP.

{image4}Hadzic said that in previous years there were attempts to change laws, but there was no political will to do so. Although the existing security services, military and civilian sevicers are renamed, there was no essential reform.

In new law it was proposed that insted of the current three, there are two security services, Security Information Agency (BIA) and Military Intelligence and Security Agency (VOBA) the later of the two would be formed by joining together  the Military Security Agency (VBA) and Military Intelligence Agency (VOA). The operation of both security services would be regulated by one law.

 

Professor Milosavljevic said that the Model Law provided a way for establishing Technical and Operational center similar to one that exists in many Western European countries, which would determine measures for supervision of electronic comunications, telecommunications services, tehnical services for police and other services.

„We propose the introduction of the General Inspectorate of the security services as a separate service of the Government of Serbia, which controls the operation of the services and Technical and Operational center. So far control and monitoring of services have not produced the best results. Although there is a Security Services Control Committee it is necessary to have greater contol. It is difficult to ensure political neutrality, but I believe that the operational independence is possible“ said Milosavljevic.

{image2}Former Director of VBA Svetko Kovac believes that the solutions of the proposed model is good, but in addition to this law should be adopted special law on security checks, which provides more controll over this activity.

„We had a period when the parliamentary control functioned remarkably, because we had good and professional people who were highly motivated to do the job. Very important question is the impact that government has on work of security services“, emphasizes Kovac.

Speaking about joining VBA and VOA, Kovac points out that this would improve function of the intelligence services, but that the process of joining is a very sensitive question.

„Analytics and logistics would be joined together, while the operation remains the same.There are many models by which the service could be merged,but for us the most acceptable is Croatian model,which integrates well many functions“, says Kovač.

Some of the solutions that Model Law provides are improvement of the provisions on matter of service such as security protection of institutions, people, buildings and premises of the importance of security, data exchange betwin relevant services.

Model Law provides a rule that during the election of directors of security services the opinion of the President of the Republic, the National Assembly of Serbia and the National Security Council is acknowledged, but that directors are elected on the basis of competence and not on political affiliation or loyality to the state leadership.

{image3}

After Belgrade Model Law will be presented in Niš, Novi Pazar and Novi Sad, and than it will be submitted to state authorities for consideration, so that potentially enter parliamentary procedure.

Organisation of the event is supported by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands in Belgrade, in the framework of the project „LEGASI – Towards Legislative of Security Intelligence System“ and creation of Model law is supported by OSCE Mission to Serbia.

 

 

Report was translated by BCSP Intern Mirjana Arsic.

 

 

RELATED

  • Date: 18.12.2025.

    Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy

    The Civil Committee for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers strongly condemns the threats directed at journalist Vuk Cvijić, which occurred on December 17 and were allegedly triggered by an article he wrote for the weekly Radar.

  • Date: 04.11.2025.

    Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy

    At the panel discussion “Freedoms Under Pressure: Civil Society and Digital Oversight in Serbia and Abroad”, organised by the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy (BCSP) on 31 October in Belgrade, speakers warned that digital surveillance and spyware use are rapidly becoming tools of political control in Serbia and across Europe, posing severe risks to human rights and democracy.

  • Date: 18.09.2025.

    Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy

    The Civil Committee for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers calls on the competent Public Prosecutor’s Office to immediately act upon information about an alleged plot to assassinate student Pavle Cicvarić, as publicly stated on Informer television by Siniša Vučinić, a member of the Main Board of the Serbian Progressive Party.