The citizens of Serbia and Kosovo support the dialogue, but it is not clear to them what exactly Belgrade and Pristina are negotiating about. The dialogue has not improved mutual relations, nor do citizens feel personal benefit from it. At the interpersonal level, the ethnic distance between Serbs and Albanians is great and most would not accept the other as a family member or superior at work. This could change if politicians and the media close to them change their current narratives, it was pointed out during event co-organized by the Belgrade Centrr for Security Policy (BCSP), Foreign Policy Institute at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies and the Kosovo Center for Security Studies (KCSS) on December 7th.

The findings of public opinion poll on Kosovo issue were analysed by Belgrade Centre for Security Policy researchers Maja Bjeloš and Bojan Elek.

According to a public opinion survey Serbian citizens identify Russia and China as their greatest friends. As the country's most important foreign policy priorities, citizens recognize preserving Kosovo as part of Serbia, strengthening cooperation with neighboring countries and strengthening cooperation with Russia. More than half of the citizens do not support Serbia's membership in the EU.

The general finding of the new prEUgovor’s semi-annual Alarm Report is that almost nothing was done in the Chapters 23 and 24, from May to October 2020. The report was presented on November 17th via Zoom. The conference concluded that the report documents state capture in various areas - drawing public resources for the ruling parties' election campaign and through non-transparent procurement, politicization of law enforcement agencies, which leads to selective justice, and negligence towards the needs of particularly vulnerable groups.

We present the latest Alarm report published by prEUgovor coalition.

What experts from Belgrade, Pristina, Brussels and Washington think about the role of the United States in solving the Kosovo problem - read in the BCSP publication published within this year's Belgrade Security Forum.

The educational policy study presents to the wider public basic and up-to-date background information on policies, legislation, and institutional frameworks in which the EU conducts its anti-OC efforts.

The author of the analysis offers a brief overview of the political and economic cooperation between the two countries.

As NATO’s presence in the Balkan region continues to grow, experts generally agree that NATO’s pursuit of regional cooperation and mutually beneficial relationships for security has had some level of success, but also acknowledge that NATO membership has been a source of bureaucratic frustration for some members. In the discussion “NATO in the Balkans, the Balkans in NATO,” the balance of these benefits and challenges were reflected upon by experts who analyzed how this influence has impacted the region.