SHARE
News:
Battle for the rule of law in the Western Balkans
{image1} Numerous incidents, starting from the Savamala case in Serbia, followed by the beating of protesters in Montenegro, together with the mass wiretapping scandal in Macedonia, signified the regression of the rule of law in the Balkans, is one of the conclusions of the second panel of the conference “Security ...
{image1}
Numerous incidents, starting from the Savamala case in Serbia, followed by the beating of protesters in Montenegro, together with the mass wiretapping scandal in Macedonia, signified the regression of the rule of law in the Balkans, is one of the conclusions of the second panel of the conference “Security challenges as a link between the citizens and institutions”, which was organized by Belgrade Center for Security Policy (BCSP) on the 21st December 2016 in Belgrade.
National case studies on the rule of law in Serbia, Montenegro and Macedonia, which were developed within the project Monitoring and Evaluation of the Rule of Law in the Western Balkans, financed by the European Fund for the Balkans (EFB) were presented at the panel.
The process of the European integrations has little impact on the citizens’ everyday life, and Serbia still has laws and the Constitution, but not legality and constitutionality, which can best be illustrated by Savamala case, empasized Elek.
Montenegro is seen as the leader of the European integrations in the region, but the actual state in the society is not good, says Ana Djurnic from the Institut Alternativa from Podgorica.
{image2}At the conference was stated that human rights and media freedoms are at the bottom of the Government agenda in Montenegro.
Macedonia was struck by a political crisis where the information about wiretapping of 20.000 people was central point.
The biggest progress in Macedonia has been made in the field of fight against terrorism, but solely on the normative level, while most severe regression has been seen in judiciary, it is the opinion of European Policy Institute.
Civil society organizations criticise and offer solutions to many problems, but it often happens that they are isolated and that their suggestions get refused, was the conclusion of the discussion.
The event was organized with the support of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the European Union through the program of support to civil society and the European Fund for the Balkans through the regional program “Think and Link.” The views and opinions expressed here and at the panels do not necessarily represent the views of the Government of Norway, the European Union, the European Fund for the Balkans and other related organizations.
This article was translated by BCSP intern Emilija Davidovic.
RELATED

Date: 18.12.2025.
Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy
The Civil Committee for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers strongly condemns the threats directed at journalist Vuk Cvijić, which occurred on December 17 and were allegedly triggered by an article he wrote for the weekly Radar.

Date: 04.11.2025.
Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy
At the panel discussion “Freedoms Under Pressure: Civil Society and Digital Oversight in Serbia and Abroad”, organised by the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy (BCSP) on 31 October in Belgrade, speakers warned that digital surveillance and spyware use are rapidly becoming tools of political control in Serbia and across Europe, posing severe risks to human rights and democracy.

Date: 18.09.2025.
Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy
The Civil Committee for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders and Whistleblowers calls on the competent Public Prosecutor’s Office to immediately act upon information about an alleged plot to assassinate student Pavle Cicvarić, as publicly stated on Informer television by Siniša Vučinić, a member of the Main Board of the Serbian Progressive Party.
