PUBLICATION: Glossary

Extremism and Telegram

The contemporary information environment has redefined the ecosystem of extremist groups, shifting them significantly towards online engagement.

Unlike offline movements from previous decades, modern extremists are often radicalised via the internet through various forums, alternative tech platforms, and encrypted messaging applications. These digital spaces play a crucial role in overcoming traditional geographical boundaries, enabling effective networking, dissemination of extremist ideas, recruitment of new members, and resource collection for both online and offline activities.

As a consequence of these tightened regulatory policies, Telegram has become a hub for extremism and conspiracy theories, experiencing rapid growth— from 300 million monthly active users in 2019 to 400 million in April 2020. Within this context, this backgrounder aims to provide an overview of key concepts and terms related to extremism on Telegram.

The author of this backgrounder is Katarina Bogićević, an intern at the Belgrade Centre for Security Policy.

Skip to PDF content

DETAILS

DATE: 14.05.2025

TYPE: Glossary

DOI Number: <a href="https://doi.org/10.55042/QCOP1243" target="blank">https://doi.org/10.55042/QCOP1243

AUTHORS

SHARE

RELATED

  • Date: 30.06.2026.

    Author: Gorana Pebić | Isidora Stakić | Miloš Jovanović |

    This report analyses recent and so far insufficiently explored forms of extremism in Serbia, with a particular focus on anti-system extremism, the role of the Telegram digital platform and the instrumentalisation of environmental issues.

  • Date: 26.06.2026.

    Author: Gorana Pebić |

    The analysis explores how far-right Telegram channels instrumentalise opposition to the Rio Tinto project and lithium mining in Serbia to amplify their pre-existing nationalist and anti-Western narratives.

  • Date: 27.05.2026.

    Author: Anđela Savić |

    Civil society organisations, journalists, and human rights defenders across the Western Balkans and European Union (EU) are operating in a digital environment defined by raising threats and inadequate protection. This analysis presents findings from a needs assessment survey conducted within the “Defending Digital Freedoms: Strengthening Civil Society Resilience against Digital Repression in Europe” project, gathering 239 responses from 11 countries (six Western Balkan and five EU member states).