PUBLICATION: Research report

Friends or Foes? External Actors and the EU’s Western Balkans Policy

This publication assesses how six external actors - Russia, China, Türkiye, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Israel, and Azerbaijan - engage with the Western Balkans (WB) and how such engagement affects the European Union (EU) enlargement process.

The analysis is anchored in: (1) Desk research on foreign influence and security dynamics in the WB; (2) 27 structured expert interviews conducted in November–December 2025 using a standard questionnaire; and (3) targeted open-source research to verify interview claims and fine-tune the empirical findings where necessary.

The main output of the research is the Threatometer: three comparable tables rating each actor across three criteria: (i) the prominence of the EU in that actor’s policy vis-à-vis the WB; (ii) the degree to which the actor poses a threat to the European Project; and (iii) the degree of overlap between that actor’s policy and the EU’s agenda in the WB.

Skip to PDF content

DETAILS

DATE: 24.03.2026

DOI Number: <a href="https://doi.org/10.55042/SOQO9919" target="blank">https://doi.org/10.55042/SOQO9919

AUTHORS

SHARE

RELATED

  • Date: 27.05.2026.

    Author: Anđela Savić |

    Civil society organisations, journalists, and human rights defenders across the Western Balkans and European Union (EU) are operating in a digital environment defined by raising threats and inadequate protection. This analysis presents findings from a needs assessment survey conducted within the “Defending Digital Freedoms: Strengthening Civil Society Resilience against Digital Repression in Europe” project, gathering 239 responses from 11 countries (six Western Balkan and five EU member states).

  • Date: 07.04.2026.

    Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy

    This paper examines how the Serbian Orthodox Church (SOC) is portrayed in existing research and media discourse, primarily as a major conduit of Russian influence in the Western Balkans through narratives tied to the Kremlin’s “Russian World” project and hybrid warfare activities.

  • Date: 09.02.2026.

    Author: Maja Bjeloš |

    The concept of the “colour revolution” has shifted from describing democratic uprisings in post-socialist states to serving as a powerful tool of authoritarian control. In Serbia, the ruling elite—drawing heavily on the Russian strategic playbook—has reframed the term as a symbol of foreign subversion aimed at overthrowing the government and destabilising the country. Since 2012, this narrative has been systematically used to delegitimise dissent, protests, and civic mobilisation.