PUBLICATION: Study
Who Defends the Defenders? Mechanisms for the Protection of Human Rights Defenders
Human rights defenders are people who act, individually or jointly, to advance human rights and fundamental freedoms and fight for their protection at the local, national and international levels.
As a rule, the activities of defenders are opposed to the interests of the powerful, whether they are governments or private corporations, and therefore need protection. This study analyses legal and institutional instruments for the protection of defenders at the international level and in six countries: Colombia, Mexico, DR Congo, the Philippines, Türkiye and Serbia. In these countries, human rights defenders are in a difficult position, facing numerous threats and pressures – from police repression, through defamation campaigns to legal prosecution. Thus, these are countries where there is a need for additional protection of defenders, but (still) a significant discrepancy between the normative level and practice.
The study provides an overview of the existing instruments for the protection of human rights defenders in these countries, as well as an analysis of their effectiveness in a broader socio-political context.
PDF PREVIEW
RELATED
Date: 07.04.2026.
Author: Belgrade Centre for Security Policy
This paper examines how the Serbian Orthodox Church (SOC) is portrayed in existing research and media discourse, primarily as a major conduit of Russian influence in the Western Balkans through narratives tied to the Kremlin’s “Russian World” project and hybrid warfare activities.
Date: 24.03.2026.
Author: Dr Srđan Cvijić |
This publication assesses how six external actors - Russia, China, Türkiye, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Israel, and Azerbaijan - engage with the Western Balkans (WB) and how such engagement affects the European Union (EU) enlargement process.
Date: 09.02.2026.
Author: Maja Bjeloš |
The concept of the “colour revolution” has shifted from describing democratic uprisings in post-socialist states to serving as a powerful tool of authoritarian control. In Serbia, the ruling elite—drawing heavily on the Russian strategic playbook—has reframed the term as a symbol of foreign subversion aimed at overthrowing the government and destabilising the country. Since 2012, this narrative has been systematically used to delegitimise dissent, protests, and civic mobilisation.
